Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:
citymanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The e-mail address you entered couldn't be found. Please check the recipient's e-mail address and try to resend the message. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk.
Diagnostic information for administrators:
Generating server: ci.homer.ak.us
citymanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
#550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipNotFound; not found ##
Original message headers:
Received: from mail14.ess.barracuda.com (64.235.154.141) by
CoH-Mail.ci.homer.ak.us (172.21.10.198) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id
14.3.319.2; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 22:52:36 -0900
Received: from mail-io0-f172.google.com (mail-io0-f172.google.com
[209.85.223.172]) by mx1429.ess.rzc.cudaops.com (version=TLSv1.2
cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 01 Mar 2017
07:52:33 +0000
Received: by mail-io0-f172.google.com with SMTP id f84so24722851ioj.0;
Tue, 28 Feb 2017 23:52:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=DI9GxjGCBOzuMN8/Dqwp15ZXqR+9b/Ex1SjKjFgDsZY=;
b=IJq0Od9eg66404SOyVjcg6m8vkdKSJ6KEkZ//iXBYryAOjRUZknRk9Bg4OHE23tQdd
zE/TLHte0lVK85YhQ99lkgfjv7RT4+YoObexZvc4C1u7YC/vE59uaBSOtd1M2j9z4EHr
pMk8Q+nvyizJUSRlUM6IcWI+QC1m2VQ3lbE0nZ8M+vKJaI+o8A/RkAb4sAAgHbelXgV1
dB0443uY7z+1VyFjLUz2nw0tBAPlx3Z2iClHkLBlVXntIFdpv62rO/9qtP1qchyCsib7
KPxXRJKdyDc5RyK1bJlwqN+P489JvjrxLFxcWcqb2z+D8KHikEitQTT8HhTQe/mnK5dw
HcCg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=DI9GxjGCBOzuMN8/Dqwp15ZXqR+9b/Ex1SjKjFgDsZY=;
b=ZHA0t9+3h/DI0mWBLmF1HMtqoyRkHGG0adrZ4BkeGOnwDW7lO5adYBdBhfiip0LDkq
x4qmDJvSQDuggqqy4xqeHMXI4pnEF1VzVcck9+9d3yfx+zwlbZWu8Op6Ryms36BGXZoN
xGR5f+wTUpYsqCE3AXhMKIFh9AXzsBICHS2WjI8BETmveT1VJHeBVTE4UIcm8xpIJ53P
lL4rbqY0MYiRCegKwyLx70UKd9gHgfNs9yLPhJWwn9MVo4ZzdvRaE4Ng/I1NMTi8K4wh
msyxC+W5YWSSfO02Flid5zA3F3roUPeoSowvCbtNqbTWEJ2XaNyWVOixL7jfR9ZBdDDb
etTQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kDerxkEq1tjuwmLwqEmZxKIP91oYVARbm4AVmdyUnY/wxhmbDlNz/2pF7T+km97/3E9l9bs8GQyUqtoQ==
X-Received: by 10.107.190.196 with SMTP id o187mr7393449iof.95.1488354752812;
Tue, 28 Feb 2017 23:52:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.12.133 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 23:52:32 -0800 (PST)
From: Trisha Davis <deadfallmtn@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 22:52:32 -0900
Message-ID: <CAFi99HMr9mqShek-sAELE3HMRURFWijoJRYpy1XMkYLG+5MpwA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Resolution 17-019
To: <mayor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <citymanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114f32745761e00549a69845"
X-BESS-ID: 1488354753-683784-13848-260270-1
X-BESS-VER: 2017.2-r1702242332
X-BESS-Trusted-Forwarder: 209.85.223.172
X-BESS-Apparent-Source-IP: 209.85.223.172
X-BESS-Spam-Status: SCORE=0.00 using account:ESS23004 scores of QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1.5 KILL_LEVEL=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE
Received-SPF: pass (mx1429.ess.rzc.cudaops.com: domain of deadfallmtn@xxxxxxxxx designates 209.85.223.172 as permitted sender)
X-BESS-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.178927
Rule breakdown below
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------
0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
X-BESS-Spam-Score: 0.00
X-BESS-BRTS-Status: 1
Return-Path: deadfallmtn@xxxxxxxxx
--- Begin Message ---
- To: "mayor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <mayor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "citymanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <citymanager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Resolution 17-019
- From: "Trisha Davis" <deadfallmtn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Mar 2017 07:52:32 +0000
- Importance: Normal
Mayor Zak,
Thank you for the intent of the City Council regarding Resolution 17-019 and the grace displayed when the Council came under fire. I doubt anyone of you thought the evening would be so difficult; I surely didn’t.
Not a resident of Homer proper, I attended the meeting on the 27th of February as an interested person, an observer. The depth of emotions expressed came as a surprise to me. Reading the proposed Resolution, I found nothing offensive so I can only conclude it was a carry-over from the leaked, unofficial version. In truth, I am not a fan of the current president—but even I was disturbed by that original document.
As an observer last night, I tried to figure what made so many so mad. I kept hearing one person after another say they were offended that the Council thought so little of them. I believe it is human nature to believe we are better people than we probably are or what others may think. If kindness is a virtue, then of course, they are kind and if bias is a negative word, then we distance ourselves from those who wear that label.
I heard statements about the damage done to the community, the divisiveness that now exists and thought if this Resolution—which so many felt was instructive—could, instead, be RECOGNITION or AFFIRMATION of the quality of Homer citizen’s character, everyone would be busting their buttons and doing their best to live up to it. Yes, I know that is not all of what you were trying to accomplish. (I was thrilled with the prospect of Homer becoming a Sanctuary City) But, perhaps, this could be the balm offered to sooth the many hurt feelings and allow harmony to return to our greater community.
I salute you and those who strive to serve. As you know all too well, you’ve chosen a difficult path that can never meet every person’s expectations and will be challenged many times before you are through. Let your hearts lead you and your minds light the path.
Respectfully,
Trisha J. Davis
--- End Message ---
Reporting-MTA: dns;ci.homer.ak.us Received-From-MTA: dns;mail14.ess.barracuda.com Arrival-Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 07:52:36 +0000 Final-Recipient: rfc822;citymanager@ci.homer.ak.us Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.1.1 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipNotFound; not found